V. Definitions of Prohibited Conduct

Sexual Assault

Includes both Sexual Intercourse Without Consent and Sexual Contact Without Consent.

Sexual Intercourse Without Consent

Means having or attempting to have sexual intercourse with another individual without Affirmative Consent, as defined below. Sexual intercourse means vaginal or anal penetration, however slight, with any body part or object, or oral penetration involving mouth to genital contact.

Sexual Contact Without Consent

Means having sexual contact with another individual without Affirmative Consent, as defined below. Sexual contact means the touching of the person’s breasts, anal, groin, or genital areas, or other intimate body parts for the purpose of sexual gratification.

Sexual Assault is an extreme form of sexual harassment. For more information about sexual harassment, which is also prohibited by SAIC’s policies, please see the policies on Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation within these guides: Student Rights and Responsibilities, Staff Anti-Harassment Policy, and Faculty Policy Against Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation. If a report includes allegations of Sexual Assault, then the process and procedures set forth in this Policy will be followed in the assessment, investigation and resolution of the complaint. In no event shall a complaint proceed simultaneously through more than one internal SAIC procedure.

Affirmative Consent

Consent represents the cornerstone of a respectful and healthy intimate relationship. SAIC strongly encourages its community members to communicate – openly, honestly and clearly–about their actions, wishes, and intentions when it comes to sexual behavior, and to do so before engaging in sexual conduct.

Consent is the communication of an affirmative, conscious and freely made decision by each participant to engage in agreed upon forms of sexual contact. Consent requires an outward demonstration, through understandable words or actions, that conveys a clear willingness to engage in sexual contact.

Consent is not to be inferred from silence, passivity, or a lack of resistance, and relying on non-verbal communication alone may result in a violation of this Policy. For example, a person who does not physically resist or verbally refuse sexual contact may not necessarily be giving consent. There is no requirement that an individual verbally or physically resist unwelcome sexual contact for there to be a violation of this Policy.

Consent is not to be inferred from a current or previous dating or sexual relationship. Even in the context of a relationship, there must be mutual consent to engage in sexual contact.

Consent to one form of sexual contact does not constitute consent to any other form of sexual contact, nor does consent to sexual contact with one person constitute consent to sexual contact with any other person. Additionally, consent to sexual contact on one occasion is not consent to engage in sexual contact on another occasion. A person’s manner of dress does not constitute consent.

Consent cannot be obtained by coercion or force or by taking advantage of one’s inability to give consent because of Incapacitation or other circumstances. Under Illinois law, a person must be at least 17 years old in order to give consent. It is also illegal in Illinois for a person 17 years old or older to commit sexual acts on a person under the age of 18 if they have a position of authority or trust over that person.

A person who has given consent to engage in sexual contact may withdraw consent at any time. However, withdrawal of consent requires an outward demonstration, through understandable words or actions, that clearly conveys that the person is no longer willing to engage in sexual contact. Once consent is withdrawn, the sexual contact must cease immediately.

Incapacitation or Incapacitated

An individual who is Incapacitated is unable to give Affirmative Consent. States of Incapacitation include sleep, unconsciousness, intermittent consciousness, or any other state where the individual is unaware that sexual contact is occurring. Incapacitation may also exist because of a mental or developmental disability that impairs the ability to consent to sexual contact.

Alcohol or drug use is one of the prime causes of Incapacitation. Where alcohol or drug use is involved, Incapacitation is a state beyond intoxication, impairment in judgment, or “drunkenness.” Because the impact of alcohol or other drugs varies from person to person, evaluating whether an individual is Incapacitated, and therefore unable to give Affirmative Consent, requires an assessment of whether the consumption of alcohol or other drugs has rendered the individual physically helpless or substantially incapable of:

Where an individual’s level of impairment does not rise to Incapacitation, it is still necessary to evaluate the impact of intoxication on Affirmative Consent. In evaluating whether Affirmative Consent was sought or given, the following factors may be relevant:

No matter the level of an individual’s intoxication, if that individual has not affirmatively agreed to engage in sexual contact, there is no Affirmative Consent.

Anyone engaging in sexual contact must be aware of both their own and the other person’s level of intoxication and capacity to give Affirmative Consent. The use of alcohol or other drugs can lower inhibitions and create an atmosphere of confusion about whether consent is effectively sought and freely given. If there is any doubt as to the level or extent of one’s own or the other individual’s intoxication or Incapacitation, the safest course of action is to forgo or cease any sexual contact. An individual’s intoxication is never an excuse for or a defense to committing Sexual Assault and it does not diminish one’s responsibility to obtain Affirmative Consent.

Domestic Violence

Domestic Violence is violence committed by a current or former spouse, intimate partner, or family member of the other person. Domestic violence includes, but is not limited to, sexual or physical abuse or the threat of such abuse. Domestic violence requires more than just two people living together; the people cohabitating must be spouses, family members, or have, or have had, an intimate relationship. 

Dating Violence

Is violence committed by a person who is or has been in a relationship of romantic or intimate nature with the other person. Dating violence includes, but is not limited to, sexual or physical abuse or the threat of such abuse. The existence of such a relationship shall take into account the length of the relationship, the type of relationship, and the frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship.

Stalking

Is a course of conduct directed at a specific person that is unwelcome and would cause a reasonable person to fear for their safety (or the safety of a third party) or suffer emotional distress.

Course of conduct

Means two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which the stalker directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by any action, method, device, or means, follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, or communicates to or about a person, or interferes with a person’s property.

Reasonable person

Means a reasonable person under similar circumstances and with similar identities to the victim.

Substantial emotional distress

Means significant mental suffering or anguish that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling.

Retaliation

Retaliation against anyone reporting, participating in, or thought to have reported or participated in, a good faith allegation or investigation regarding Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, or Stalking is also prohibited. Retaliation will be treated as a violation of this Policy regardless of whether any report of Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, or Stalking is substantiated. Retaliation is defined as any adverse or negative action against an individual because that individual has:

False accusations, made with knowledge that they are false, are prohibited and will be treated as violations of this Policy. A good faith complaint that later is not substantiated is not considered to be a false accusation and, therefore, is not a violation of the Policy.